AASP ANNUAL MEETING -- L.R. WILSON BEST STUDENT PAPER AWARD

Evaluate each item on a 5-point scale or qualitatively if you prefer, 
but rank the posters highest to lowest

  1 - unacceptable   2 - poor  3 - average  4 - good  5 - outstanding

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                                                                    COMMENTS
DELIVERY

AUDIBILITY			1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__

CLARITY/ SPEED			1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__

POISE				1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__

APPEARANCE			1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CONTENT

STATEMENT OF RESEARCH PROBLEM							COMMENTS
         Clarity 		1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__
         Scientific Merit	1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS
         Clarity 		1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__
         Adequacy for Problem	1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__

RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS
         Clarity 		1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__
         Supported by Data	1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__

ILLUSTRATIONS
         Clarity 		1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__
         Neatness		1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__
         Necessary to Talk	1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__
         
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

OTHER COMMENTS:	








AASP Awards Committee, 10/23/98